X is facing new criticism. People say X is not clear enough about how it changes its computer systems. These systems decide what posts users see on the platform. Several groups worry about this. They include lawmakers and groups that watch technology companies. They feel X is not telling people enough. They want more information about how these changes happen.

(X Faces Criticism Over Transparency in Algorithm Changes)

The main complaint is about secret changes. Experts say X makes adjustments to its algorithms often. They say these changes can change what news people see. They can change how many people see different opinions. But X usually does not explain these changes well. The company gives few details to users. It gives few details to researchers. This makes it hard to understand what happens.

Some lawmakers in the U.S. are asking questions. They sent letters to X recently. They want to know how the company decides what content gets seen by more people. They worry these decisions affect important public discussions. They worry about elections. They worry about news people trust. They want X to be more open about its rules. They want X to be more open about how it applies these rules.

Critics argue this lack of openness is a problem. They say users deserve to know why they see certain posts. They say researchers need information to study the platform’s effects. Without clear details, they cannot check for problems. They cannot check for unfair treatment of some viewpoints. They cannot see if the changes are fair.

(X Faces Criticism Over Transparency in Algorithm Changes)

X has not said much about these complaints recently. The company has talked about its algorithms before. It has shared some information in the past. But many feel it is not enough. They feel it is not consistent. They want regular, clear updates about big changes. They want X to explain why changes are made. They want X to explain what effects are expected. The debate over X’s transparency continues.